Maths › Practise › Questions › Log graphs and exponential models
Questions on log graphs and exponential models
Plotting log y against log x gives a straight line for a power law, and plotting log y against x gives a straight line for an exponential, with the gradient and intercept determining the constants. Fit such a model to data, use it, and state the conditions under which it stops being reasonable.
16 original questions · 65 marks · the log graphs and exponential models notes · Exponentials and logarithms
To print: the questions (PDF, 83 KB) · the worked answers (PDF, 66 KB)
These are original InkMaths questions. Write a complete answer before opening the worked solution and marking guidance.
A quantity is believed to follow a power law y = axn. State what should be plotted to test the claim, and what the gradient and intercept of the resulting line give.
Worked solution and marking guidance
Plot log y against log x. Taking logs of y = axn gives log y = log a + n log x, so the points fall on a straight line with gradient n and intercept log a. Straightness on logged axes is the evidence for the law. B1 for what to plot, B1 for the gradient, B1 for the intercept. The intercept is log a, not a, so a is recovered by undoing the logarithm.A quantity is believed to follow exponential growth y = abx. State what should be plotted, and what the gradient and intercept give.
Worked solution and marking guidance
Plot log y against x itself rather than log x. The law gives log y = log a + x log b, a line with gradient log b and intercept log a. B1 for what to plot, B1 for the gradient, B1 for the intercept.A data set is plotted two ways: log y against log x gives a curve, and log y against x gives a straight line. State which of the two models, y = axn or y = kbx, fits the data, and explain your reasoning.
Worked solution and marking guidance
The model is y = kbx, the exponential law. B1 for identifying it. A power law only becomes a straight line when log x is used, since log y = log a + n log x is linear in log x: a curve on that plot rules a power law out. B1 for that reasoning. An exponential law becomes a straight line when the raw x is used instead, since log y = log k + x log b is linear in x itself, which matches the second plot exactly. B1 for that reasoning.Explain why testing a power law y = axn against data requires x > 0 as well as y > 0, and state what happens to a measurement taken at x = 0 on a log-log plot.
Worked solution and marking guidance
log x is undefined for x ≤ 0, since no power of a positive base produces zero or a negative number, so log x can only be formed when x is positive; the same is true of log y and y. B1 for the positivity condition on both variables. A measurement at x = 0 has no logarithm to plot at all, so that point cannot appear on a log-log axis and has to be left out of the fit, whatever it showed on the original axes. B1 for the point being unplottable, B1 for it being dropped rather than plotted at some extreme position.A quantity follows y = axn, and measurements give (4, 40) and (9, 135). Find n and a, and state the law.
Worked solution and marking guidance
The log-log gradient is n = (log 135 − log 40)/(log 9 − log 4) = log 3.375 ÷ log 2.25 = 1.5 exactly, since 3.375 = 2.251.5. Then a = 40/41.5 = 40/8 = 5, and the law is y = 5x1.5. M1 for forming the log-log gradient, A1 for n = 1.5, M1 for substituting a point to find a, A1 for the law. The second point checks it: 5 × 91.5 = 5 × 27 = 135.A mass in grams is modelled by m = 60e−0.1t, with t in days. State the initial mass, find the mass after 5 days, and find the half-life of the decay, each to 3 significant figures where rounding is needed.
Worked solution and marking guidance
The initial mass is the front constant, 60 g, since e0 = 1. After 5 days, m = 60e−0.5 = 36.4 g. Halving means e−0.1t = ½, so −0.1t = ln ½ and t = ln 2/0.1 = 6.93 days. B1 for 60 g, M1 for substituting t = 5, A1 for 36.4 g, M1 for setting the exponential to ½ and taking logs, A1 for 6.93 days. The half-life never depends on the starting mass, so the 60 cancels before the log is taken.The model y = 3 × 5x is to be drawn as a straight line. State what should be plotted, and give the line's gradient and intercept to 3 significant figures.
Worked solution and marking guidance
Plot log y against x. Taking logs: log y = log 3 + x log 5, so the gradient is log 5 = 0.699 and the intercept is log 3 = 0.477. B1 for what to plot, B1 for 0.699, B1 for 0.477.A graph of log10 y against x is a straight line through (0, 2) and (10, 3.5). Find the model y = kbx, giving k and b each to 3 significant figures.
Worked solution and marking guidance
The intercept, at x = 0, is log k = 2, so k = 10² = 100. M1 for reading the intercept, A1 for k = 100. The gradient is (3.5 − 2)/(10 − 0) = 0.15, and the gradient is log b, so b = 100.15 = 1.41 to 3 significant figures. M1 for the gradient, A1 for b = 1.41.An investment is modelled by V = 500 × 1.08t, t in years. Using the linear relationship log V = log 500 + t log 1.08, find, to 3 significant figures, the number of years for the investment to reach £2000.
Worked solution and marking guidance
Substituting V = 2000 into the linear relationship, log 2000 = log 500 + t log 1.08, so t = (log 2000 − log 500)/log 1.08 = log 4/log 1.08, since 2000/500 = 4. M1 for the linear relationship with V = 2000, A1 for the equation solved for t. This gives t = 18.0 years to 3 significant figures. M1 for the division, A1 for 18.0.A population is modelled by P = 400 × 1.15t, t in years. Evaluate P at t = 50 to 3 significant figures, and explain, giving a reason grounded in the real system, why the model is unlikely to remain valid that far into the future.
Worked solution and marking guidance
P(50) = 400 × 1.1550 = 433 000 to 3 significant figures. M1 for substituting t = 50, A1 for 433 000. The model assumes the population keeps growing by the same 15% every year forever, but a real population is limited by food, space and other resources, so the growth rate falls as the population approaches whatever the environment can support, and an unlimited exponential model stops describing it well before it reaches numbers this large. B1 for naming the limiting resource, B1 for stating that the growth rate itself would have to fall.The table gives measurements of a quantity y against x: (1, 3), (4, 6) and (9, 9). By finding log x and log y for each pair, or otherwise, determine whether a power law y = axn or an exponential law y = kbx fits the data, and state the law.
Worked solution and marking guidance
Testing the power law first: the log-log gradient between (1, 3) and (4, 6) is (log 6 − log 3)/(log 4 − log 1) = log 2/log 4 = 0.5, and between (4, 6) and (9, 9) it is (log 9 − log 6)/(log 9 − log 4) = 0.5 again, the same value both times. M1 for forming a log-log gradient, A1 for the two gradients agreeing at 0.5. Testing the exponential law instead, the log-linear gradient between the same pairs is (log 6 − log 3)/(4 − 1) ≈ 0.100 and (log 9 − log 6)/(9 − 4) ≈ 0.0352, which do not agree. M1 for showing the log-linear gradient is inconsistent. So the data follows the power law, not the exponential one. A1 for that conclusion. With n = 0.5, a = 3/10.5 = 3, so the law is y = 3√x, and the third point confirms it: 3 × √9 = 3 × 3 = 9. A1 for the law. A single log-log gradient could arise from either family by coincidence at one pair of points; agreement across two independent pairs is what rules the exponential law out here.A log-log plot of some data gives a straight line with gradient 0.5 and intercept log 6. Find the law connecting y and x, and the value of y when x = 25.
Worked solution and marking guidance
The line says log y = 0.5 log x + log 6, so the law is y = 6x0.5 = 6√x. At x = 25, y = 6 × 5 = 30. M1 for undoing the logs, A1 for the law, M1 for substituting x = 25, A1 for 30.For the decay model m = 60e−0.1t, show that the ratio m(t + 7)/m(t) is the same for every t, and find its value to 3 significant figures.
Worked solution and marking guidance
m(t + 7)/m(t) = e−0.1(t+7)/e−0.1t = e−0.7 = 0.497, with the t-dependence cancelling entirely. M1 for forming the ratio, A1 for the t-dependence cancelling, A1 for 0.497.By taking logarithms of y = kbx, show that the gradient of the line obtained by plotting log10 y against x is log10 b. Hence, for two savings models V1 = 1000 × 1.05t and V2 = 1000 × 1.03t, state each model's gradient to 4 significant figures, and explain which model has the larger percentage growth rate, without evaluating either model at any particular t.
Worked solution and marking guidance
Taking logs of y = kbx gives log y = log k + x log b, a straight line in x with gradient log b, whatever k is. B1 for the derivation. For V1, the gradient is log 1.05 = 0.02119; for V2, it is log 1.03 = 0.01284, each to 4 significant figures. M1 for the method, A1 for 0.02119, A1 for 0.01284. The percentage growth rate is set by b alone, 5% for V1 against 3% for V2, and log is an increasing function, so the larger b gives the larger gradient: V1 has the larger percentage growth rate. B1 for the conclusion with the reasoning.A radioactive isotope decays according to m = m0e−kt. Its mass is found to fall to 1/8 of its initial value after 30 years. Find k to 3 significant figures, and the half-life to the nearest year. Then explain how the half-life could have been read off directly from the 1/8 reading, without finding k first.
Worked solution and marking guidance
e−30k = 1/8, so −30k = ln 1/8 = −ln 8 = −3 ln 2, and k = 3 ln 2/30 = ln 2/10 = 0.0693 per year to 3 significant figures. M1 for the equation in k, M1 for writing ln 8 as 3 ln 2, A1 for k = 0.0693. The half-life T satisfies e−kT = ½, so T = ln 2/k = ln 2/(ln 2/10) = 10 years. M1 for T = ln 2/k, A1 for T = 10 years. Falling to 1/8 is falling to (½)3, three successive halvings, so the elapsed time of 30 years is exactly three half-lives and the half-life is 30/3 = 10 years directly, with no equation in k needed at all. B1 for that shortcut, correctly linking 1/8 to three halvings.A quantity y is measured at several values of x, and log10 y is plotted against x, as shown in the graph. The readings are believed to fit a model of the form y = kbx. Use the graph to find the values of k and b, giving b to 3 significant figures, and use your model to estimate y when x = 5. Explain why an estimate of y at x = 12 from the same model should be treated with caution.
Five readings plotted as log10 y against x, with a straight line drawn through them. Worked solution and marking guidance
Taking logarithms of y = kbx gives log10 y = log10 k + x log10 b, which is a straight line against x with gradient log10 b and vertical intercept log10 k. The line passes through the plotted points (0, 2) and (8, 6), so its gradient is (6 − 2)/(8 − 0) = 0.5. M1 for a gradient taken from two points read off the line. Then log10 b = 0.5, so b = 100.5 = 3.16 to 3 significant figures. A1 for b. The line meets the vertical axis at 2, so log10 k = 2 and k = 102 = 100. B1 for k. At x = 5 the model gives log10 y = 0.5 × 5 + 2 = 4.5. M1 for substituting x = 5. So y = 104.5 = 3.16 × 104 to 3 significant figures. A1 for the estimate. The plotted readings only cover 0 ≤ x ≤ 8, so x = 12 is well outside them: the estimate there assumes the straight line continues where nothing has been measured, and an exponential model climbs so steeply that a small error in the gradient becomes a large error in y. B1 for the caution about extrapolating beyond the data. Reading k straight off the axis as 2 mistakes the intercept for k; the intercept is log10 k, not k.
All questions, worked solutions and marking guidance are original InkMaths material. They are not copied from awarding-body papers or mark schemes. The codes show how InkMaths allocates the stated total; an awarding body may credit a valid alternative method differently.
The same practice on paper: the printable workbook for this topic, with the questions and a worked answer book.
Practise log graphs and exponential models one question at a time
In the player, mark your own response after viewing the worked solution. Your score decides when the question is offered again.