PhysicsAstrophysics › The HR diagram and stellar evolution

The HR diagram and stellar evolution

Plot absolute magnitude against spectral class and stars fall into the main sequence, the giants and the white dwarfs rather than spreading out at random. Following a star off the main sequence gives the rest of the topic: red giants, white dwarfs, supernovae, neutron stars and black holes.

Builds on Black-body radiation and spectral classes and Gravitational potential.

IN THIS TOPIC

  • Sketch the HR diagram with temperature running hot-left to cool-right, the vertical axis read as luminosity increasing upward or as the reversed absolute-magnitude scale, and label the main sequence, red giants, supergiants and white dwarfs.
  • Describe the evolution of a Sun-like star as a path across the diagram, through the red giant and planetary nebula stages to a white dwarf.
  • Describe the evolution of a massive star through the red supergiant and supernova stages to a neutron star or a black hole.
  • Explain why a type Ia supernova works as a standard candle, read its light curve, and say what standardises it.
  • Compare a gamma-ray burst's energy output with the Sun's.
  • Recall neutron star properties and use the Schwarzschild radius for black holes.

COMMON MISCONCEPTION

The Sun will end its life in a supernova.

One diagram, every star

Take a large sample of stars, work out each one's absolute magnitude and temperature using the tools of the last two lessons, and plot one against the other. The result, the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, is the most information-dense picture in astronomy. Two axis conventions want keeping apart. The temperature axis genuinely runs backwards: from about 50 000 K on the left down to 2500 K on the right, so hotter is left, and it is often labelled by spectral class OBAFGKM instead. The vertical axis is only backwards when it carries absolute magnitude, whose scale was born reversed: it runs from +15 at the bottom to −10 at the top, so brighter is still higher.

The vertical axis carries the star's own output, and the boards differ only in what they print on it. Some draw the same diagram with luminosity up the side, the total power radiated, given as a multiple of the Sun's and on a logarithmic scale from about 10−4 to 106, increasing upward like any ordinary log axis. That is not a different diagram. Absolute magnitude is itself a logarithmic measure of the same power, running the opposite way, which is exactly why the magnitude axis is drawn upside down: brighter is higher whichever label is printed. Read either as a luminosity against temperature plot and the picture is the same.

The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram: absolute magnitude against spectral class, with the diagonal main sequence, giants and supergiants above, white dwarfs below-10-50+5+10+15OBAFGKMthe Sunmain sequencesupergiantsred giantswhite dwarfsbrighter upward: absolute magnitude M, or luminosityhotcoolspectral class
FIG. 1The HR diagram. Ninety per cent of stars sit on the diagonal main sequence; red giants blaze above it on the cool side, white dwarfs smoulder below it on the hot side, and the amber arrows preview the Sun's own future.

Stars do not scatter randomly. Most crowd onto the main sequence, the diagonal band running from hot-and-bright down to cool-and-dim, and every star on it is fusing hydrogen in its core. The Sun sits partway down, class G, absolute magnitude +4.8. The red giants sit above and to the right, cool at the surface yet hugely luminous, which by Stefan's law forces them to be enormous.

The extremes sit further out again. Higher still, in a band stretched right across the top of the diagram, are the supergiants, and the cool right-hand end of that band is the red supergiants, the swollen late stage of a heavy star: tens of thousands of times the Sun's luminosity at a surface no hotter than a red giant's, which by the same argument makes them hundreds of times the Sun's radius. Betelgeuse is the one everybody knows. Below and to the left are the white dwarfs, hot yet so faint they must be tiny. That is the Earth-sized object from the last lesson's check question.

The life of a Sun-like star

Every star begins as a nebula, a cloud of gas and dust collapsing under its own gravity. The collapse heats the core, now a protostar, until hydrogen fusion lights. The star then settles where the outward push of radiation and gas pressure balances gravity, and that equilibrium is what the main sequence is.

A star spends most of its life parked at one spot on the main sequence, fusing core hydrogen. When the core hydrogen runs low, the balance breaks. The core contracts and heats, fusion moves outward into a shell, and the outer layers swell colossally while their surface cools towards red. On the diagram the star leaves the main sequence and climbs up and to the right, becoming a red giant. The Sun will do this in about five billion years, swelling past the orbits of the inner planets.

A star of the Sun's modest mass cannot ignite much beyond helium. The bloated outer layers drift away as a glowing shell called a planetary nebula, lit by the hot core it has just uncovered. The name is a two-hundred-year-old misunderstanding, kept out of habit: in a small telescope those shells looked like the discs of planets, and there are no planets involved. What the shell leaves behind is the exposed core, a white dwarf, no longer fusing, roughly Earth-sized and doomed only to cool.

With fusion gone, what holds it up is electron degeneracy pressure, a quantum refusal of electrons to be squeezed into the same state. That support has a ceiling, the Chandrasekhar limit of about 1.4 solar masses, and a core heavier than that cannot end as a white dwarf. On the diagram the star drops down and to the left into the white dwarf region and fades. That is the Sun's whole future. Supernovae are reserved for far heavier stars.

Supernovae and the standard candle

A star several times the Sun's mass dies harder, and it takes a different road to get there. Leaving the main sequence it swells past the red giant stage into a red supergiant, out at the cool end of that band across the top of the diagram, while its core fuses on through carbon, oxygen and silicon as far as iron, where fusion stops releasing energy and the support fails. The core collapses, and the energy that collapse releases blasts the outer layers away as a core-collapse supernova, leaving a neutron star, or a black hole if the surviving core is heavy enough.

The explosion is what an observer actually sees of all that. The star brightens with astonishing speed, its absolute magnitude dropping by ten or more on the backwards scale within weeks, and for a while it outshines its entire galaxy. Keep the core-collapse label attached, because the breed that matters for distances comes from something else entirely.

Some collapsing giants also fire off gamma-ray bursts, flashes of gamma radiation lasting seconds to minutes and detectable across most of the observable universe. The spec asks you to set that output beside the Sun's, so carry the two numbers. A burst radiates of order 1045 J in a few seconds, quoting the isotropic-equivalent energy, the figure computed as if the burst shone equally in every direction when in reality it is beamed. The Sun pours out 3.9 × 1026 W, so across its whole ten-billion-year life it will manage roughly 1044 J. One burst, in seconds, beats the Sun's entire career.

The light curve of a type Ia supernova: a rise of days to a peak absolute magnitude near minus 19.3, much the same every time, then a decline over months-19-17-15100 d200 dpeak: always close to M = −19.3timebrighter upwardthe repeatable peak makes it a standard candle
FIG. 2The type Ia light curve: a rise of about two and a half weeks to a peak absolute magnitude close to −19.3, then a decline over months. The peak lands near the same value every time, and the small spread that remains is corrected using the rate of decline.

A type Ia supernova is a different animal. No massive star is involved at all. A white dwarf in a binary system detonates as a runaway thermonuclear explosion, and the fuel is broadly similar every time, a carbon-oxygen dwarf igniting through a limited set of routes, more than one of which is still argued over. That is why the peaks come out alike, near absolute magnitude −19.3, without being identical. Any object of known absolute magnitude is a standard candle. Measure its apparent magnitude, run the distance modulus, and out comes the distance.

Two qualifications belong with that. The trigger is not a single settled story. A dwarf may pull matter from an ordinary companion until it approaches the limit, or two white dwarfs may spiral together and merge, or a dwarf below the limit may be set off by a detonating skin of helium, and which route dominates is still argued over. Nor are the peaks identical. They scatter by a few tenths of a magnitude, and the fix comes from the light curve itself, since the brighter explosions fade the more slowly.

Measure the decline rate over the first fortnight or so after the peak and it tells you how bright that particular explosion really was, which is how astronomers pull the scatter down to around a tenth of a magnitude. Type Ia supernovae are therefore standardisable candles rather than perfectly identical ones, and they are bright enough to serve as distance markers across billions of light years.

They also started an argument. In the late 1990s distant type Ia supernovae came out consistently fainter than their red shifts predicted, and within the standard cosmological model that means the expansion of the universe is accelerating, driven by something now labelled dark energy. The claim leans on type Ia explosions behaving the same way across cosmic history, once corrected, and questioning that uniformity is the heart of the controversy. A standard candle is only as standard as its physics.

WORKED EXAMPLE

The candle as a ruler

A type Ia supernova peaks at apparent magnitude +16.7. Taking its peak absolute magnitude as −19.3, find the distance to its galaxy.

m − M = 16.7 − (−19.3) = 36.0.

5 log(d/10) = 36.0, so log(d/10) = 7.2 and d = 10 × 107.2 = 1.6 × 108 pc.

A hundred and sixty million parsecs, from one photometric measurement. Real work would first correct that −19.3 using the measured decline rate, which shifts the answer by a few per cent. This is how the accelerating universe was discovered, one exploding white dwarf at a time.

Neutron stars and black holes

Heavier cores leave heavier corpses. Stars born with more than roughly eight solar masses, a model-dependent boundary rather than a sharp line, are the ones whose cores collapse this way. If the collapsing core is too massive to settle as a white dwarf, gravity crushes its protons and electrons together into neutrons, leaving a neutron star. Picture one or two solar masses compressed into a sphere roughly ten kilometres in radius, made almost entirely of neutrons, at the density of an atomic nucleus.

GUIDED PRACTICE

Nuclear matter by the teaspoon

A neutron star has mass 2.8 × 1030 kg, 1.4 solar masses, and radius 10 km. Find its density, and the mass of one teaspoonful, 5.0 × 10−6 m3.

Show the working

ρ = M / (4/3 πr3) = 2.8 × 1030 / (4.19 × 1012) = 6.7 × 1017 kg m−3.

One teaspoon holds 6.7 × 1017 × 5.0 × 10−63 × 1012 kg. Three billion tonnes, about three hundred thousand Eiffel Towers, in a spoon.

Past even that, nothing holds. If the corpse is massive enough, its escape velocity, 2GM/r\sqrt{2GM/r} from the gravitational fields unit, reaches the speed of light at a finite radius. Inside that boundary nothing, light included, can leave, and the object is a black hole. The boundary is the event horizon, and its radius, the Schwarzschild radius, follows from a Newtonian shortcut, setting the escape velocity equal to c, a heuristic that happens to land on the answer general relativity gives:

Rs2GMc2R_{s} ≈ \frac{2GM}{c^{2}}ON THE AQA DATA SHEET

WORKED EXAMPLE

The Sun, hypothetically crushed

Find the Schwarzschild radius for one solar mass, 1.99 × 1030 kg.

Rs = 2GM/c2 = (2 × 6.67 × 10−11 × 1.99 × 1030) / (3.0 × 108)2 = 3.0 km.

The Sun will never collapse this far, but the number sets the scale: to make any mass a black hole, squeeze it inside its Schwarzschild radius, about three kilometres per solar mass.

INDEPENDENT PRACTICE

The monster at the centre

Observations of stars orbiting the centre of our galaxy reveal a supermassive black hole of about 4 × 106 solar masses. Find its Schwarzschild radius.

Show the working

Rs scales in direct proportion to M, so Rs = 3.0 km × 4 × 106 = 1.2 × 1010 m.

About seventeen times the radius of the Sun, for four million solar masses. Supermassive black holes like this one appear to sit at the centre of most large galaxies, ours included.

Naming the furniture, an OCR definition set

OCR opens its astrophysics with six terms and asks for each one defined by name. No other board examines the list, so read this section only if OCR A is your specification. The six climb in scale, and defining them in that order is the easiest way to keep them apart.

A planet is a body in orbit around a star, massive enough that its own gravity has pulled it into a nearly spherical shape and massive enough to have swept its orbital neighbourhood clear of other bodies. In visible light it shines chiefly by reflection, though like any warm body it also emits its own thermal radiation, mostly infrared; nothing fuses inside it. A planetary satellite is a body in orbit around a planet rather than around the star directly, which covers natural moons and the artificial satellites of the gravitational fields unit alike.

A comet is a small body of ice, dust and rock orbiting a star on a highly elliptical path. Far out it is inert. Close in, the Sun's heat drives the ice straight to vapour, and radiation pressure and the solar wind blow the released gas and dust into a tail that always points away from the Sun, whichever way the comet happens to be travelling.

A solar system is a star together with everything gravitationally bound to it, meaning its planets, their satellites, and the asteroids, comets and dust between them. Ours takes the capital letters. A galaxy is a gravitationally bound collection of stars, gas, dust and dark matter, anything from millions to hundreds of billions of stars, usually with a supermassive black hole at its centre. The universe is everything that exists: all matter and radiation, and the space and time they occupy. The ladder runs satellite, planet, solar system, galaxy, universe, with each rung bound to the one above it by gravity.

ASSESSMENT FOCUS

  • Sketching the HR diagram earns marks for the axes before anything else. Absolute magnitude +15 to −10 upward, or luminosity in solar units on a log scale, and temperature 50 000 K to 2500 K left to right, or OBAFGKM. Temperature runs backwards, and so does a magnitude scale; a luminosity axis climbs upward perfectly normally. Label whichever you draw, and if a paper gives you a luminosity axis, only the label changes: brighter is higher either way.
  • Place the four populations and the Sun. Main sequence on the diagonal, red giants top right, supergiants in a band right across the top with the red supergiants at its cool end, white dwarfs bottom left, Sun on the main sequence at class G, about +4.8.
  • The Sun-like evolution answer is a path, so narrate it on the diagram. Main sequence, then up and right to red giant as shells fuse and the surface cools, then the outer layers off as a planetary nebula, then down and left to white dwarf.
  • The heavy-star path is the other half of the same question, and the stage names carry the marks. Main sequence, red supergiant, core-collapse supernova, then a neutron star, or a black hole if the remnant core is heavy enough.
  • Type Ia as a standard candle is a three-step argument, and all three steps score. A carbon-oxygen white dwarf detonating in a narrow range of conditions, so a peak absolute magnitude near −19.3, standardised by the light curve, so apparent magnitude plus distance modulus gives the distance. A type Ia is not a core-collapse event, so keep massive stars out of that answer.
  • If a question asks how good the candle is, stating the limitation earns credit. The peaks scatter by a few tenths of a magnitude, and the decline rate of the light curve is used to correct each one, so type Ia supernovae are standardisable rather than identical.
  • For gamma-ray bursts, quote the comparison rather than waving at it. Around 1045 J in seconds against the Sun's 1044 J over its whole lifetime.
  • Rs ≈ 2GM/c2 questions are usually substitution plus commentary. Quote the radius, then say what the event horizon is, the boundary from inside which not even light escapes.
  • OCR asks for the six terms as definitions, so give each one its distinguishing clause rather than an example. Orbits a star and has cleared its orbit for a planet, orbits a planet for a planetary satellite, ice on a highly elliptical orbit with a tail pointing away from the Sun for a comet, a star plus everything bound to it for a solar system, and gravitationally bound stars, gas and dust for a galaxy. No other board sets this list.

CHECK YOURSELF

Describe the future of the Sun as a track on the HR diagram, naming each stage, and explain in one sentence each why the Sun will not become a supernova and why type Ia supernovae can be used to measure distance.

Show a hint

Three stages on the diagram. Then mass for the first sentence, fixed peak brightness for the second.

Show the answer

The Sun sits on the main sequence now. When core hydrogen runs low it swells and cools, moving up and to the right as a red giant. After shedding its outer layers the remnant drops down and left as a white dwarf, then cools and fades.

It will not go supernova, because its mass is far below what core collapse requires, so a white dwarf is the endpoint.

Type Ia supernovae are white dwarfs detonating in closely similar conditions, so they peak at nearly the same absolute magnitude, about −19.3, and the small remaining spread is corrected using the light curve's decline rate. Comparing that peak with the measured apparent magnitude gives the distance through the distance modulus.

The HR diagram maps brightness against temperature, hot on the left; only a magnitude scale runs backwards.

Sun-like stars end as white dwarfs, held up by electron degeneracy pressure below 1.4 solar masses.

Heavier stars die as core-collapse supernovae and leave a neutron star or a black hole.

A type Ia is a detonating white dwarf, standardised by its rate of decline.

WORKBOOK

Printable practice for this topic: original exam-style questions with room to work, and a fully worked answer book. Free to use; please do not redistribute or sell.

19 questions on this topicAnswer them one at a time and mark yourself against the mark scheme.Practise this topic

Or read them with their mark schemes on the hr diagram and stellar evolution questions page.

16 flashcards on this topicDefinitions, off-sheet equations and a spot-the-error card, scheduled by spaced repetition in your browser.Revise with flashcards

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS

Rate how confident you feel with each objective for this lesson. Ratings are saved in this browser, on this device, unless you sign in.

  • Sketch the HR diagram with temperature running hot-left to cool-right, the vertical axis read as luminosity increasing upward or as the reversed absolute-magnitude scale, and label the main sequence, red giants, supergiants and white dwarfs.
  • Describe the evolution of a Sun-like star as a path across the diagram, through the red giant and planetary nebula stages to a white dwarf.
  • Describe the evolution of a massive star through the red supergiant and supernova stages to a neutron star or a black hole.
  • Explain why a type Ia supernova works as a standard candle, read its light curve, and say what standardises it.
  • Compare a gamma-ray burst's energy output with the Sun's.
  • Recall neutron star properties and use the Schwarzschild radius for black holes.

Open the full revision checklist to track your progress across the whole unit.