Biology › Gene regulation, genomics and biotechnology › Pharming, recombinant medicines and synthetic biology
Pharming, recombinant medicines and synthetic biology
Recombinant medicines such as large therapeutic proteins are usually made in living cells, because correct folding and post-translational modification are hard to achieve by chemical synthesis. The processing a protein needs determines which cells are used. Pharming uses genetically modified plants or animals to produce medicines. Synthetic biology assembles well-characterised genetic parts and pathways to carry out a defined function.
Key terms Every definition in gene regulation, genomics and biotechnology, lesson by lesson
Before this Recombinant DNA: vectors, transformation and markers · Translation and protein synthesis – post-translational modification · Promoters and tissue-specific gene expression · Somatic and germ line gene therapy
COMMON MISCONCEPTION
Once the human gene is in, any cell will do: a protein is a protein whoever manufactures it.
The expression host must provide the processing required by the protein. E. coli can produce insulin, which needs limited post-translational modification; factor VIII requires eukaryotic folding and glycosylation, so it is produced in mammalian cells or another suitable eukaryotic system.
What you should be able to do
- Name factor VIII and adenosine deaminase as recombinant medicines, state what each treats, and explain what recombinant production replaced.CAIE
- Explain why some human proteins must be made in eukaryotic cells rather than in bacteria.
- Describe how a transgenic animal is engineered to secrete a human protein in its milk, and explain the role of the mammary-specific promoter.
- Set out the welfare and regulatory arguments around pharming on both sides.
- Describe what synthetic biology adds to genetic engineering, using standard parts, genome synthesis and the artemisinin pathway as the named examples.
- Argue the biosecurity and ownership questions synthetic biology raises, from both directions.
- Describe how genetically modified plants are used to produce medicines, with a named example, and weigh the advantages against the risks.
Medicines that are proteins
Large or extensively modified therapeutic proteins are usually produced in living cells because correct folding and post-translational processing are difficult to reproduce by chemical synthesis. The required processing determines whether bacterial, yeast or mammalian cells are suitable. Some short peptides are synthesised chemically, and cell-free expression systems exist, so cellular production is a practical requirement for large glycoproteins rather than an absolute rule for all protein drugs.
Before recombinant DNA technology, protein medicines were extracted from an organism that already made them, and the two named examples on the specification show the consequences of that.
Factor VIII is the clotting factor missing in the commonest severe haemophilia. For decades it was concentrated from donated blood plasma, pooled from thousands of donors per batch. In the early 1980s that pooling proved catastrophic. Plasma from a single infected donor contaminated whole batches, and a large fraction of the people treated for haemophilia in that era were infected with HIV, hepatitis C or both. Heat and solvent-detergent treatment of the concentrates, introduced from 1985, stopped transmission of HIV and then hepatitis C.
Recombinant factor VIII went further and removed the donor pool itself. It has been made since the 1990s by cultured mammalian cells carrying the human gene, so no blood-borne pathogen, known or not yet discovered, can reach the product by that route.
Describe the drawing
A graph with the number of donations pooled into one batch on a logarithmic horizontal axis from one to twenty thousand, and the probability that the batch holds at least one infected donation on the vertical axis from nought to one. Three curves are drawn, one for each rate of undetected infection in a single donation: one in a thousand, one in ten thousand and one in a hundred thousand. At the left-hand edge, where the pool is a single donation, the three sit a hundredfold apart and all of them are on the floor of the graph. By the dashed line marking a batch of five thousand donations they have risen to about ninety-nine per cent, thirty-nine per cent and five per cent, and by twenty thousand donations to a hundred, eighty-six and eighteen per cent, so the hundredfold difference between the three has collapsed to less than sixfold.
Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is the enzyme whose absence causes one form of severe combined immunodeficiency, the condition you met in the gene therapy lesson. Before gene therapy, and still alongside it, patients are treated with injections of the enzyme itself, chemically stabilised so it survives in the blood. It was first purified from cattle and since 2018 has been produced recombinantly. The same condition therefore has two recombinant treatments: supplying the protein, or supplying the gene.
Mammalian cells are preferred to a cheaper bacterial fermenter because E. coli transcribes and translates a human gene without carrying out the processing that follows. Factor VIII requires chaperoned folding, disulfide bridges at specific positions, and sugar chains added in a Golgi apparatus. A bacterium cannot supply that processing, so it yields a polypeptide with the correct primary structure and without the required folding or glycosylation. Insulin is small and requires little post-translational modification, so it can be produced in bacteria. The required processing determines the expression host.
- Recombinant medicine
- A protein drug produced by cells carrying an introduced copy of the human gene, rather than extracted from blood or tissue.
- Factor VIII
- The clotting protein deficient in haemophilia A, produced recombinantly in mammalian cell culture since the 1990s.
- Adenosine deaminase
- The enzyme missing in ADA-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency, supplied to patients as a recombinant protein.
Pharming: expression in milk
Pharming uses genetically modified organisms, including plants and animals, to produce pharmaceutical substances. A tissue-specific promoter can direct expression in milk, but yield depends on the construct and species.
Mammalian cell culture is effective but expensive: the cells grow slowly, require a rich sterile medium, and yield from milligrams per litre for complex proteins such as factor VIII to grams per litre for antibodies. A lactating transgenic animal secretes the protein into milk, which is collected by milking and is a simpler starting material to purify than cell culture medium or plasma. Reported yields vary widely between constructs and species, from milligrams to several grams per litre, so quote a figure with its source rather than a general rate.
Describe the drawing
The genetic construct used in pharming, drawn as a length of DNA carrying a promoter taken from a goat milk-protein gene immediately upstream of the human gene for the wanted protein. An arrow leads down through injection into a fertilised egg to a row of four tissue cards for the resulting adult animal: mammary gland, liver, muscle and skin. Every tissue carries the construct, but only the mammary gland card is highlighted as reading it, because the promoter is active nowhere else, so the human protein is secreted into the milk and purified from it.
The construct is the part to describe precisely. The human gene is joined downstream of the promoter of a milk protein gene, such as β-lactoglobulin. The transcription factors that switch that promoter on exist only in mammary gland cells during lactation. The construct is microinjected into the nucleus of a fertilised egg, or introduced into cultured cells from which an embryo is then cloned by nuclear transfer, and the embryo is implanted into a surrogate.
Microinjection can produce mosaic founders, in which only some cells carry the insert, so animals must be screened and a confirmed line established before production begins. A female of that established line carries the gene in every cell and expresses it in one tissue. Her milk carries the human protein, her blood and other tissues carry very little, and purification starts from milk.
Antithrombin is the licensed example: an anticoagulant protein produced in the milk of a herd of transgenic goats. It was approved as a drug in Europe in 2006, the first medicine from a transgenic animal to be licensed. A herd of goats can supply quantities that would otherwise require very large numbers of blood donations.
- Pharming
- The use of genetically modified organisms, including plants and animals, to produce pharmaceutical substances; in livestock, classically in milk.
- Mammary-specific promoter
- The promoter of a milk protein gene, placed in front of an introduced gene so that the gene is transcribed only in mammary gland cells during lactation.
Plants as factories for medicines
Pearson Edexcel Biology A names three kinds of genetically modified organism used to make drugs: microorganisms, animals and plants. Microorganisms make human insulin in fermenters, and animals are covered above. Plants are the third.
The human gene is joined to a promoter that plant cells recognise and introduced with Agrobacterium tumefaciens or a gene gun. Two approaches are used. In a stable transgenic plant the gene is inserted into a chromosome and inherited through seed, so the crop can be grown year after year. A seed-specific promoter can confine the protein to the seeds, where it keeps well in storage, much as a milk-protein promoter confines a goat's product to her milk.
In transient expression, the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana, a fast-growing relative of tobacco, are flooded with agrobacteria carrying the gene. The leaf cells make the protein for a few days without the gene entering their chromosomes, and the leaves are then harvested and the protein extracted. Transient expression takes weeks, where establishing a transgenic line takes years.
Three examples show the range. Taliglucerase alfa is an enzyme given to people with Gaucher disease, whose cells lack it, and is made by genetically modified carrot cells grown in culture vessels. In 2012 it became the first plant-made medicine approved for human use in the United States. ZMapp, a mixture of three monoclonal antibodies against Ebola virus, was made by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana and given to some patients in the 2014 West African outbreak. The trial that followed was too small to show conclusively whether it worked. A COVID-19 vaccine made of virus-like particles produced in the same plant was approved in Canada in 2022, though the company that made it closed the following year.
| For plants as a source of medicines | Against |
|---|---|
| Growing more plants is cheap, so production scales up without new steel vessels | Plant cells attach sugar chains that differ in detail from human ones, and these can provoke an immune response |
| Plant cells are eukaryotic, so they fold proteins and add sugar chains, which bacteria cannot do | A crop grown in the open can pass its gene to other plants in pollen, or its seed can end up in food |
| No human or animal virus, and no prion, can grow in a plant, so none can contaminate the product | Yields vary with the plant and the season, and purifying a protein from plant tissue is costly |
| Seeds store some proteins stably without refrigeration | Fewer plant-made drugs have been through the approval process, so the regulatory route is less established |
Containment has failed before. In 2002 maize plants engineered to make a vaccine protein for pigs sprang up from fallen seed in a Nebraska field that had been replanted with soya beans. The soya harvested there had to be destroyed. Most plant-made medicines are now produced in non-food plants such as Nicotiana benthamiana, in greenhouses, or in plant cell culture in closed vessels. That removes the escape route at the cost of some of the cheapness.
- Plant-made pharmaceutical
- A medicine, usually a protein, produced by genetically modified plants or plant cells carrying the gene for it.
- Transient expression
- Production of a protein from a gene delivered into cells for a few days without being inserted into their chromosomes.
Welfare and regulatory considerations
The arguments about pharming are set out below on each side, with the evidence for each.
Welfare, against. Making a founder animal is inefficient. Microinjection succeeds in a small percentage of eggs, so producing one transgenic goat means many surrogate pregnancies, failed implantations and discarded embryos. Where cloning is used it brings its own losses, since a large fraction of cloned pregnancies fail late or produce unhealthy offspring. Critics add a deeper objection: that redesigning an animal's genome to serve as production equipment treats a sentient creature as an instrument, whatever its day-to-day conditions.
Welfare, for. Once the founder exists, the producing herd is bred normally and kept as a dairy herd. Milking does not harm the animal, and the commercial requirement for clean, consistent milk means the animals are housed and fed to a high standard. Supporters also compare the alternatives: the protein would otherwise come from pooled human plasma, with the safety record described above, or from cell culture at a cost some health systems will not meet.
Regulation. A drug from a living animal poses questions a steel fermenter does not. Milk composition varies with the animal, the season and the feed, so every batch must be purified and tested to prove it identical to the last. The herd must be certified free of infections, and of prion disease in particular, that could pass into the product. The animals themselves must be contained, because a transgenic goat that bred into an ordinary herd would spread a pharmaceutical gene that could never be recalled. Regulators answered with closed, certified herds, animals identified and tracked individually, and approval processes that took years. The animals are also patented, one instance of the ownership question treated below.
Synthetic biology: parts, genomes and pathways
Recombinant DNA technology introduces one gene at a time into an organism that is otherwise unchanged. Synthetic biology assembles characterised genetic components and pathways for defined functions, treating DNA as an engineering material that is specified, synthesised to order, and assembled into circuits and pathways not found in any organism.
It has three levels. Standard parts: promoters, ribosome binding sites, genes and terminators catalogued with defined, measured behaviour, designed so that any part joins to any other, the way electronic components share standard connections. An engineer picks parts from the registry and assembles a device instead of hunting each sequence from scratch. Genome synthesis: whole genomes built chemically from their sequence data.
A bacterial genome of about a million base pairs was synthesised and installed in a recipient cell in 2010, and the cell ran on it. Stripped-down versions since have asked what the minimum set of genes for life actually is. Engineered pathways: several genes, from several organisms, assembled so that a cell runs a metabolic production line it never had.
Describe the drawing
Three tiers showing the synthetic biology method. At the top, five separated standard parts sit in a row: a promoter, three genes and a terminator, each drawn as a labelled block. An arrow carries them to the middle tier where the same blocks are joined end to end with no gaps, promoter first and terminator last. A second arrow drops the assembly into a large rounded outline standing for a yeast cell, inside which a short pathway runs from sugar through an intermediate to artemisinic acid, with each arrow between them labelled as an enzyme made from one of the added genes, and a final line notes that a few chemical steps in a factory finish the antimalarial artemisinin.
The named pathway example is artemisinin, the antimalarial used in combination therapy worldwide. It is extracted from sweet wormwood, a crop whose yield and price varied substantially between years. A pathway of enzymes, some from the plant and some derived from yeast's own metabolism, was assembled in brewer's yeast. The yeast converts sugar into artemisinic acid, which industrial chemical steps then convert into artemisinin. Production began at scale in 2013 as a supply that does not depend solely on the harvest, but it was suspended within about two years when plant-derived artemisinin became cheaper.
- Synthetic biology
- The design and construction of new biological parts, devices and pathways, and the redesign of existing organisms, treating DNA as a specifiable engineering material.
- Standard part
- A DNA sequence with a defined function, catalogued and designed to be assembled with any other standard part.
Biosecurity and ownership
The same capability, DNA synthesised to order, underlies both the applications and the risks of synthetic biology. The specifications require the arguments on each side, which are paired below.
Biosecurity. Poliovirus was assembled from mail-ordered DNA fragments and published in 2002, and an extinct relative of smallpox was synthesised in 2017 for around one hundred thousand dollars. The barrier to recreating a dangerous pathogen is therefore money and published sequence, not rare skill. Against that: the same openness lets any public-health laboratory synthesise a new pathogen's genes within days of its sequence appearing, and vaccine development now starts that way.
The response to the risk has been screening, not secrecy. Synthesis companies check orders against databases of dangerous sequences and flag the customers who place them. Screening is voluntary and coverage differs between suppliers, and the point at issue is whether voluntary screening suffices. Date any claim about screening practice or regulation, since both change.
Ownership. Engineered organisms and standard parts can be patented, and the case for is the usual case for patents. Development costs run to hundreds of millions, and no company recovers that without a period of exclusivity, so patents pay for the goats, the yeast and the trials. The case against has two layers. One is access: a patented medicine is priced by its owner, and the diseases synthetic biology could treat most cheaply are concentrated where patients are poorest.
The other is displacement, and artemisinin is the worked case. Fermenter production stabilises the drug supply and also competes with the smallholder farmers who grow wormwood, so the same process cuts supply risk for health systems and cuts income for those growers. A boundary question is also unresolved in law. An engineered gene sequence can be patented, while a naturally occurring human gene has not been patentable in the United States since 2013. Whether the design of an entire organism can be owned is not settled.
TRY IT: Evaluating a synthetic biology proposal
A company announces it will synthesise and sell, to research laboratories only, DNA fragments of any sequence up to 10 000 base pairs, arguing that fast synthesis accelerates vaccine research. A critic replies that the same service could assemble a dangerous virus. Evaluate both claims and suggest one safeguard the company could adopt.
Check your answer
The company's claim is sound as far as it goes. Vaccine work now begins from published sequence, and synthesising a pathogen's surface protein genes in days shortens development, where the older route waited for samples of the organism to be shipped and cultured. The 2002 poliovirus work and everything since show synthesis at this scale is practical.
The critic's claim is also sound, and for the same reason. Several dangerous viruses have genomes small enough to assemble from fragments of the size offered, and the poliovirus and horsepox syntheses demonstrate that publication plus purchasable DNA can equal a live pathogen. The two claims do not contradict each other; they describe the same capability pointed in different directions.
A defensible judgement retains the service with a safeguard: screen every order against the sequences of known dangerous pathogens, verify the customer's identity, and refuse or report matches. That is the safeguard the major synthesis companies operate. State its limitation: screening is voluntary and coverage differs between suppliers.
In the exam
- Name the two recombinant medicines with their conditions: factor VIII for haemophilia A, adenosine deaminase for ADA-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency.
- Give the mechanism behind the change to recombinant factor VIII: pooled plasma transmitted HIV and hepatitis viruses, and cultured cells carrying the gene do not.
- Give post-translational modification as the reason for using a mammalian cell rather than a bacterium: folding, disulfide bridges and glycosylation occur in eukaryotic cells, and E. coli has no Golgi apparatus.
- For pharming, give the function of the promoter: a milk-protein promoter is active in mammary gland cells during lactation, so the whole animal carries the gene and the protein is secreted into milk.
- Give both sides with reasons in welfare and regulation questions: inefficient founder production and animals treated as production systems against a well-kept herd replacing pooled plasma; batch variation and escape against closed, certified, tracked herds.
- Give the three levels of synthetic biology: standard parts, genome synthesis, and an engineered pathway, with artemisinic acid from yeast as the pathway example.
- Answer biosecurity and ownership on both sides: state the strongest version of each, then give a judgement.
- When asked how drugs are made using GMOs, cover all three sources with a named product: insulin from bacteria, antithrombin from goats, taliglucerase alfa from carrot cells.
Check yourself
A biotechnology company must choose between producing human factor VIII in genetically modified E. coli grown in fermenters, or in the milk of transgenic goats. Explain why the bacterial option is unlikely to yield a usable medicine, describe how the goat option would be set up, and give one welfare and one regulatory issue the company should expect.
Answer
The bacterial option fails at the protein, not the gene. E. coli will transcribe and translate a human factor VIII gene supplied with a bacterial promoter, but factor VIII is a large glycoprotein: it needs chaperoned folding, disulfide bridges formed correctly, and sugar chains added in the Golgi apparatus. A prokaryote has no endoplasmic reticulum and no Golgi, so what accumulates is a polypeptide with the right primary structure and the wrong tertiary structure and no glycosylation: inactive, and liable to provoke an immune reaction if injected.
The goat option: join the human factor VIII gene downstream of the promoter of a goat milk protein gene, so that only mammary gland cells during lactation transcribe it. Introduce the construct by microinjection into the nucleus of a fertilised egg, or into cultured cells used for nuclear transfer; implant the embryo in a surrogate; screen the offspring for the transgene, since microinjection can produce mosaic founders, and establish a confirmed line. A transgenic female of that line then carries the gene in every cell, expresses it only in her mammary gland, and secretes factor VIII into her milk, from which it is purified. Goats' cells are eukaryotic, so the folding and modification the bacterium could not do are done as the protein is secreted.
Welfare: founding the line is inefficient, so the company should expect many failed embryo transfers and surrogate pregnancies for each transgenic kid, and should be ready to defend that cost publicly. Regulatory: the product comes from a living animal, so every batch must be shown consistent and free of animal pathogens, the herd must be closed, certified and tracked, and the animals contained so the transgene cannot enter ordinary goat populations. The precedent is antithrombin from transgenic goats, which met these requirements and was approved in 2006.
Questions
Question 15 marksOCR A
A company will synthesise DNA of any sequence to order and sell it to research laboratories, and has patented the engineered yeast it uses in its own drug production. Evaluate the biosecurity and ownership concerns raised by work of this kind.
Mark scheme
- B1 the biosecurity worry is concrete: poliovirus was assembled from mail-ordered DNA fragments in 2002 and an extinct relative of smallpox was synthesised in 2017 for around one hundred thousand dollars, so recreating a dangerous pathogen needs money and a published sequence rather than rare skill
- B1 against that, the same openness lets a public-health laboratory synthesise a new pathogen's genes within days of its sequence appearing, which is how vaccine development now begins
- B1 the case for patents is that development costs run to hundreds of millions, and a period of exclusivity pays for the engineering, the animals and the trials
- B1 the case against is access and displacement: a patented medicine is priced by its owner and the diseases involved are concentrated where patients are poorest, and a fermenter making artemisinic acid competes with the smallholders who grow wormwood for the same drug
- B1 a judgement supported by those points, for example that the service should continue with every order screened against the sequences of known dangerous pathogens and the customer verified, while noting that such screening is voluntary and not every supplier carries it out
Question 24 marksOCR A · Edexcel A
Describe how a goat is engineered to secrete a human protein into its milk, and describe why the protein appears there and nowhere else in the animal.
Mark scheme
- B1 the human gene is joined downstream of the promoter of a milk protein gene, such as the promoter of β-lactoglobulin
- B1 the construct is microinjected into the nucleus of a fertilised egg, or introduced into cultured cells from which an embryo is cloned by nuclear transfer
- B1 the embryo is implanted into a surrogate, and the offspring are tested for the transgene; a transgenic female carries the gene in every cell of her body
- B1 the transcription factors that switch that promoter on are present only in mammary gland cells during lactation, so only those cells transcribe the gene and the protein is purified from milk rather than from blood
Question 34 marksOCR A · Edexcel A · Edexcel B
Discuss the welfare arguments for and against producing medicines in the milk of transgenic livestock.
Mark scheme
- B1 against: founding the line is inefficient, because microinjection succeeds in only a small percentage of eggs, so each transgenic animal costs many surrogate pregnancies, failed implantations and discarded embryos, and cloning adds its own late pregnancy failures
- B1 against: redesigning an animal's genome so that it serves as production equipment treats a sentient creature as an instrument, whatever its day-to-day conditions
- B1 for: once the founder exists the producing herd is bred normally and milking does not harm the animal, and the commercial need for clean, consistent milk means the animals are housed and fed to a high standard
- B1 for: the alternative sources are pooled human plasma, with the infections it transmitted, or mammalian cell culture at a price some health systems will not pay, so the welfare cost has to be weighed against the patients who would otherwise go untreated
All 17 questions with mark schemes, the other 14 set out in full on the question page.
Worth remembering
- Factor VIII for haemophilia and adenosine deaminase for severe combined immunodeficiency are the named recombinant medicines; recombinant factor VIII replaced extraction from donated human plasma.
- Proteins requiring chaperoned folding, disulfide bridges and glycosylation are produced in eukaryotic cells; bacteria are used for proteins needing little post-translational modification, such as insulin.
- Pharming: human gene behind a milk-protein promoter, introduced into a fertilised egg; founders are screened for mosaicism and a confirmed line established, and the transgenic female secretes the protein in her milk.
- Argue pharming on both sides: inefficient founder production and the treatment of animals as production systems against safe supply and a well-kept herd; regulators require batch consistency, pathogen-free certification and containment.
- Synthetic biology comprises standard parts, synthesised genomes and engineered pathways; yeast producing artemisinic acid is the pathway example.
- Biosecurity and ownership are argued rather than settled: sequence screening against synthesis misuse, which is voluntary and unevenly applied, and patents that fund development while also affecting price and displacing existing producers.
- GM plants make medicines by stable transgenic lines or transient expression in leaves; taliglucerase alfa from carrot cells is the approved example.
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
Rate how confident you are with each objective for this lesson. Ratings are saved in this browser, on this device, unless you sign in.
- Name factor VIII and adenosine deaminase as recombinant medicines, state what each treats, and explain what recombinant production replaced.CAIE
- Explain why some human proteins must be made in eukaryotic cells rather than in bacteria.
- Describe how a transgenic animal is engineered to secrete a human protein in its milk, and explain the role of the mammary-specific promoter.
- Set out the welfare and regulatory arguments around pharming on both sides.
- Describe what synthetic biology adds to genetic engineering, using standard parts, genome synthesis and the artemisinin pathway as the named examples.
- Argue the biosecurity and ownership questions synthetic biology raises, from both directions.
- Describe how genetically modified plants are used to produce medicines, with a named example, and weigh the advantages against the risks.
Open the full revision checklist to see every objective in the curriculum in one place.
Practise this lesson
WORKBOOK
The questions from this topic, on paper with room to work, and a separate book of mark schemes. Free to use; please do not redistribute or sell.