Chemistry › Practise › Questions › Lattice enthalpy and Born–Haber cycles
Questions on lattice enthalpy and Born–Haber cycles
Lattice enthalpy of formation and of dissociation and their signs, the enthalpies of atomisation, first and second ionisation energy, first and second electron affinity and formation, Born–Haber cycles for NaCl, KBr, MgCl₂ and MgO drawn as energy levels and used to calculate a missing value, the factors and trends in first electron affinity in Groups 6 and 7, the perfect ionic model against experiment as evidence of polarisation and covalent character, polarising power and polarisability, and the thermal stability of the Group 1 and 2 carbonates and nitrates explained by polarisation of the anion.
23 original questions · 77 marks · the lattice enthalpy and Born–Haber cycles notes · Thermodynamics · Flashcards for this unit
To print: the written questions (PDF, 74 KB) · the mark schemes (PDF, 82 KB)
How to use this page
- Every question here is written for this library rather than taken from a past paper. Write your answer out before opening a mark scheme: the schemes award marks point by point, and the points are much easier to see when you have something of your own to compare against.
- The player marks nothing for you. It shows one question, waits, then shows the scheme so you can mark yourself, and brings a question back sooner when it went badly.
- Each line of a scheme is one mark: B1 is a point that stands on its own, M1 a method mark, and A1 the answer or an accuracy point. A six-mark question marked by level lists what a full answer covers, then says which level an answer reaches.
- Each question’s code is the one printed in the workbook. Type inklearning.co.uk/q/ and a code to jump to its question.
- A question with board names beside its code is set by those boards only; one with none is on every specification here.
- The PDF links above print the same questions, with the answers in a separate book.
- As a rough guide, allow about 1.4 minutes a mark; each board’s papers run at their own pace.
Question codes are permanent, so the numbers on this page can skip or run out of order; nothing is missing.
Explain what the data in the table show about the bonding in calcium fluoride and in calcium iodide, and why the two compounds differ. The table gives each compound's experimental (Born–Haber) and theoretical (perfect ionic model) lattice enthalpy of formation, and the radius of its anion.
Compound Experimental / kJ mol⁻¹ Theoretical / kJ mol⁻¹ Anion radius / pm CaF₂ −2630 −2609 133 CaI₂ −2074 −1905 220 Mark scheme
Indicative content
- for calcium fluoride the experimental value is only 21 kJ mol⁻¹, under 1%, more exothermic than the theoretical one, so the perfect ionic model fits it closely and the bonding is almost purely ionic
- for calcium iodide the experimental value is 169 kJ mol⁻¹, about 8%, more exothermic than the theoretical one, a far larger departure from the ionic model
- the perfect ionic model treats every ion as a perfect sphere with its charge spread evenly, so it leaves out any distortion of the electron clouds
- the cation is Ca²⁺ in both compounds, so its polarising power is the same and the difference must come from the anion
- I⁻ is much larger than F⁻, 220 pm against 133 pm, with its outer electrons further from the nucleus and more shielded, so its electron cloud is far more easily polarised
- Ca²⁺ draws the iodide electron cloud towards itself, putting electron density between the nuclei, so CaI₂ has covalent character and its real lattice is held more strongly than the model predicts
Levels
- Level 3 (5–6 marks) both comparisons are read from the table with the sizes of the departures, the perfect ionic model is described, the common cation is used to locate the difference in the anion, and the polarisation of the larger iodide ion is explained as the cause of the covalent character and the stronger real lattice
- Level 2 (3–4 marks) the closer fit for calcium fluoride is noted and the covalent character of calcium iodide is explained by polarisation of the larger anion; the sizes of the departures, what the perfect ionic model assumes, or the role of the shared cation is not covered
- Level 1 (1–2 marks) one compound is called more ionic, typically with the iodide ion said to polarise the calcium ion, and the data are not used
Explain why the second ionisation energy of magnesium is larger than its first, and why the second electron affinity of oxygen is endothermic although its first electron affinity is exothermic.
Mark scheme
- B1 the second electron is removed from an Mg⁺ ion, which is already positively charged
- B1 the same nuclear charge acts on one fewer electron, so the remaining electrons are held more strongly and more energy is needed to remove one
- B1 the first electron affinity is exothermic because the incoming electron is attracted by the oxygen nucleus
- B1 the second electron is added to an O⁻ ion, which is already negative, so energy is needed to overcome the repulsion; reject 'oxygen has a full outer shell'
Calculate the lattice enthalpy of formation of calcium chloride from the data in the table.
Enthalpy change Value / kJ mol⁻¹ Enthalpy of formation of CaCl₂(s) −796 Enthalpy of atomisation of calcium +178 First ionisation energy of calcium +590 Second ionisation energy of calcium +1145 Enthalpy of atomisation of chlorine +122 First electron affinity of chlorine −349 Mark scheme
- M1 the atomisation and the electron affinity of chlorine are each doubled: 2 × 122 = +244 and 2 × (−349) = −698
- M1 the steps to the gaseous ions sum to 178 + 590 + 1145 + 244 − 698 = +1459 kJ mol⁻¹
- M1 ΔLEH = ΔfH − 1459, from rearranging the cycle; error carried forward from M2 where the chlorine terms were not doubled
- A1 ΔLEH = −796 − 1459 = −2255 kJ mol⁻¹, four significant figures, negative sign required
Calculate the second electron affinity of oxygen from the data in the table for calcium oxide.
Enthalpy change Value / kJ mol⁻¹ Enthalpy of formation of CaO(s) −635 Enthalpy of atomisation of calcium +178 First ionisation energy of calcium +590 Second ionisation energy of calcium +1145 Enthalpy of atomisation of oxygen +249 First electron affinity of oxygen −141 Lattice enthalpy of formation of CaO −3454 Mark scheme
- M1 ΔfH = ΔatH(Ca) + IE₁ + IE₂ + ΔatH(O) + EA₁ + EA₂ + ΔLEH, from Hess's law applied to the cycle
- M1 the known steps before the lattice sum to 178 + 590 + 1145 + 249 − 141 = +2021 kJ mol⁻¹
- M1 EA₂ = −635 − 2021 − (−3454), error carried forward from M2
- A1 EA₂ = +798 kJ mol⁻¹, three significant figures, positive sign shown; ignore a missing + sign only if the answer is described as endothermic
Complete the Born–Haber cycle for potassium chloride in the diagram: give the species, with state symbols, at levels A, B and C, and name the single step marked with a question mark.
The Born–Haber cycle for potassium chloride with every step named except the direct one, and three of its levels given only as letters. Mark scheme
- B1 level A is K(g) + ½Cl₂(g), with state symbols
- B1 level B is K⁺(g) + e⁻ + Cl(g); the electron must be shown
- B1 level C is K⁺(g) + Cl⁻(g), the electron now on the chloride ion
- B1 the enthalpy of formation of KCl(s), from the elements in their standard states
Explain why the difference between the experimental and the theoretical lattice enthalpies of the silver halides increases from silver fluoride to silver iodide.
Mark scheme
- B1 the experimental value is more exothermic than the theoretical value because the bonding has some covalent character
- B1 the Ag⁺ ion polarises the halide ion, distorting its electron cloud towards the cation
- B1 the halide ions get larger from F⁻ to I⁻, with outer electrons further from the nucleus and more shielded
- B1 so the larger ions are more easily polarised, the covalent character increases and the difference grows; reject 'the bonding becomes covalent'
Compare the lattice enthalpies of formation of potassium chloride, −718 kJ mol⁻¹, and calcium oxide, −3454 kJ mol⁻¹, and account for the difference.
Mark scheme
- B1 the lattice enthalpy of CaO is almost five times as exothermic as that of KCl
- B1 Ca²⁺ and O²⁻ carry twice the charges of K⁺ and Cl⁻, so the attraction between a pair of ions is four times as strong at the same distance
- B1 Ca²⁺ is smaller than K⁺ and O²⁻ smaller than Cl⁻, so the ions in CaO sit closer together and attract more strongly
- B1 both effects make the attraction stronger, and together they account for a factor larger than four; ignore any reference to the enthalpies of formation
Evaluate this statement: 'The experimental lattice enthalpy of silver chloride is 72 kJ mol⁻¹ more exothermic than the theoretical value, so the Born–Haber cycle for silver chloride must contain an experimental error.'
Mark scheme
- B1 the same cycle method gives sodium chloride within 3% of the theoretical value, so the method itself is sound
- B1 the silver halide differences are systematic: always in the same direction and growing from fluoride to iodide, which random error would not produce
- B1 the difference arises because the perfect ionic model ignores polarisation of the anion by Ag⁺, so it underestimates the attraction in a lattice with covalent character
- B1 the statement is therefore wrong: the model, not the measurement, is the source of the difference
Explain why magnesium carbonate decomposes on heating at a lower temperature than barium carbonate.
Mark scheme
- B1 both decompose to the metal oxide and carbon dioxide, MCO₃(s) → MO(s) + CO₂(g)
- B1 Mg²⁺ is smaller than Ba²⁺ with the same charge, so it has a higher charge density and a greater polarising power
- B1 Mg²⁺ distorts the electron cloud of the large carbonate ion more, drawing electron density towards itself
- B1 this weakens a C–O bond in the carbonate ion, so less energy is needed to break it and release CO₂; reject 'the Mg–O bond is weaker'
State what is meant by the first electron affinity of an element, and write an equation, with state symbols, for the first electron affinity of oxygen.
Mark scheme
- B1 the enthalpy change when one mole of gaseous atoms each gain one electron
- B1 to form one mole of gaseous 1− ions; accept 'negative ions' for '1− ions'
- B1 O(g) + e⁻ → O⁻(g), with every state symbol shown; allow e for e⁻
Calculate the lattice enthalpy of formation of sodium bromide from the data in the table.
Enthalpy change Value / kJ mol⁻¹ Enthalpy of formation of NaBr(s) −361 Enthalpy of atomisation of sodium +107 Enthalpy of atomisation of bromine +112 First ionisation energy of sodium +496 First electron affinity of bromine −325 Mark scheme
- M1 ΔfH = ΔatH(Na) + ΔatH(Br) + IE₁(Na) + EA₁(Br) + ΔLEH, from Hess's law applied to the cycle
- M1 the steps to the gaseous ions sum to 107 + 112 + 496 − 325 = +390 kJ mol⁻¹
- A1 ΔLEH = −361 − 390 = −751 kJ mol⁻¹, three significant figures; the negative sign is required, and +751 is awarded the two method marks only
Calculate the first electron affinity of chlorine from the data in the table for potassium chloride.
Enthalpy change Value / kJ mol⁻¹ Enthalpy of formation of KCl(s) −437 Enthalpy of atomisation of potassium +89 First ionisation energy of potassium +419 Enthalpy of atomisation of chlorine +122 Lattice enthalpy of formation of KCl −718 Mark scheme
- M1 ΔfH = ΔatH(K) + IE₁(K) + ΔatH(Cl) + EA₁(Cl) + ΔLEH, so EA₁(Cl) = ΔfH − ΔatH(K) − IE₁(K) − ΔatH(Cl) − ΔLEH
- M1 EA₁(Cl) = −437 − 89 − 419 − 122 + 718
- A1 EA₁(Cl) = −349 kJ mol⁻¹, three significant figures, negative sign required
Describe the perfect ionic model used to calculate a theoretical lattice enthalpy.
Mark scheme
- B1 each ion is treated as a perfect sphere
- B1 with its charge evenly distributed, so there is no polarisation and no covalent character
- B1 the lattice enthalpy is calculated from the electrostatic attractions and repulsions between the ions, using their charges and the distances between their centres
Suggest why the experimental and theoretical lattice enthalpies of caesium fluoride agree to within 1%.
Mark scheme
- B1 Cs⁺ is a large ion with a single charge, so it has a low charge density and is only weakly polarising
- B1 F⁻ is a small anion whose electron cloud is held tightly and is hard to distort
- B1 there is very little polarisation, so the bonding is almost purely ionic and the perfect ionic model fits
Suggest why magnesium forms MgCl₂ with chlorine rather than MgCl, even though forming Mg²⁺ needs the second ionisation energy of magnesium, +1451 kJ mol⁻¹.
Mark scheme
- B1 forming Mg²⁺ costs an extra 1451 kJ mol⁻¹, and a second chlorine atom must also be atomised and ionised
- B1 the lattice of Mg²⁺ and Cl⁻ ions has a far more exothermic lattice enthalpy, because the cation has twice the charge and is smaller, and there are more ions per formula unit
- B1 the extra lattice enthalpy more than repays the second ionisation energy, so the enthalpy of formation of MgCl₂ is much more negative than that of MgCl would be
Explain why the lattice enthalpy of an ionic compound cannot be measured directly, and how a Born–Haber cycle is used to find it.
Mark scheme
- B1 a gas of separate ions cannot be prepared and reacted in a calorimeter, so the lattice-forming step cannot be carried out and measured
- B1 by Hess's law the enthalpy change from the elements to the solid is the same by any route
- B1 the other steps in the cycle, atomisation, ionisation energy, electron affinity and formation, are measured, so the lattice enthalpy is the only unknown and is found by subtraction
Explain why the first electron affinity of bromine, −325 kJ mol⁻¹, is less exothermic than that of chlorine, −349 kJ mol⁻¹.
Mark scheme
- B1 a bromine atom is larger, so the incoming electron enters a shell further from the nucleus, 4p rather than 3p
- B1 the incoming electron is more shielded from the nucleus by more inner shells of electrons
- B1 the attraction between the nucleus and the incoming electron is weaker, so less energy is released; ignore any reference to nuclear charge alone
Suggest why the first electron affinity of fluorine, −328 kJ mol⁻¹, is less exothermic than that of chlorine, −349 kJ mol⁻¹, although a fluorine atom is smaller.
Mark scheme
- B1 the incoming electron enters the 2p subshell of fluorine, which already holds five electrons in a small volume
- B1 the repulsion between the incoming electron and those electrons is large
- B1 the repulsion cancels part of the stronger attraction to the nucleus, so less energy is released than for chlorine
Suggest why lithium carbonate decomposes when heated with a Bunsen burner but sodium carbonate does not.
Mark scheme
- B1 Li⁺ is much smaller than Na⁺ with the same charge, so its charge density is higher
- B1 Li⁺ polarises the carbonate ion more, distorting its electron cloud and weakening a C–O bond
- B1 lithium carbonate therefore decomposes to Li₂O and CO₂ at a temperature a Bunsen burner reaches, while sodium carbonate needs a far higher one
Justify the inclusion of two enthalpies of atomisation of chlorine, and of both the first and the second ionisation energies of magnesium, in the Born–Haber cycle for magnesium chloride, MgCl₂.
Mark scheme
- B1 the enthalpy of atomisation of chlorine, ½Cl₂(g) → Cl(g), forms one mole of atoms, and two moles of gaseous chlorine atoms are needed for one mole of MgCl₂, so the value is doubled; allow one Cl–Cl bond enthalpy instead
- B1 the lattice holds Mg²⁺ ions, so two electrons are removed from each gaseous magnesium atom, Mg(g) → Mg⁺(g) → Mg²⁺(g), which needs the first and then the second ionisation energy
- B1 the first electron affinity of chlorine is doubled for the same reason, one for each Cl⁻ ion; every step must match the one mole of MgCl₂(s) that the lattice enthalpy and the enthalpy of formation refer to
State what is meant by the term lattice enthalpy of formation.
Mark scheme
- B1 the enthalpy change when one mole of a solid ionic compound is formed
- B1 from its gaseous ions, under standard conditions; reject 'from its elements', which describes the enthalpy of formation
Give equations, with state symbols, for the enthalpy of atomisation of chlorine and for the second ionisation energy of calcium.
Mark scheme
- B1 ½Cl₂(g) → Cl(g), one mole of chlorine atoms formed; reject Cl₂(g) → 2Cl(g), which forms two moles
- B1 Ca⁺(g) → Ca²⁺(g) + e⁻, starting from the gaseous 1+ ion; reject Ca(g) → Ca²⁺(g) + 2e⁻
Give equations, with state symbols, for the thermal decomposition of calcium nitrate and of potassium nitrate.
Mark scheme
- B1 2Ca(NO₃)₂(s) → 2CaO(s) + 4NO₂(g) + O₂(g), balanced; allow multiples
- B1 2KNO₃(s) → 2KNO₂(s) + O₂(g), the nitrite and oxygen only; reject any equation giving NO₂
Practise lattice enthalpy and Born–Haber cycles one question at a time