Chemistry › Practise › Questions › The electrochemical series and predicting feasibility
Questions on the electrochemical series and predicting feasibility
The electrochemical series as an ordered table of E° values, the relative strengths of oxidising and reducing agents, predicting whether a redox reaction is feasible from the sign of E°cell and writing its equation, the anticlockwise rule, disproportionation, why a feasible reaction may not be seen, how concentration changes an electrode potential and the EMF of a cell, and, for other boards, the Nernst equation, ΔG° = −nFE°cell and the Faraday constant, and the link between E°cell, total entropy change and ln K.
21 original questions · 71 marks · the electrochemical series and predicting feasibility notes · Electrochemistry · Flashcards for this unit
To print: the written questions (PDF, 80 KB) · the mark schemes (PDF, 82 KB)
How to use this page
- Every question here is written for this library rather than taken from a past paper. Write your answer out before opening a mark scheme: the schemes award marks point by point, and the points are much easier to see when you have something of your own to compare against.
- The player marks nothing for you. It shows one question, waits, then shows the scheme so you can mark yourself, and brings a question back sooner when it went badly.
- Each line of a scheme is one mark: B1 is a point that stands on its own, M1 a method mark, and A1 the answer or an accuracy point. A six-mark question marked by level lists what a full answer covers, then says which level an answer reaches.
- Each question’s code is the one printed in the workbook. Type inklearning.co.uk/q/ and a code to jump to its question.
- A question with board names beside its code is set by those boards only; one with none is on every specification here.
- The PDF links above print the same questions, with the answers in a separate book.
- As a rough guide, allow about 1.4 minutes a mark; each board’s papers run at their own pace.
Question codes are permanent, so the numbers on this page can skip or run out of order; nothing is missing.
Explain the observations in the three test-tube experiments described in the first table, using the E° values given in the second table, and write an equation for each reaction that takes place.
Experiment Observation 1: chlorine water added to potassium bromide solution colourless solution turns orange-yellow 2: iron(III) chloride solution added to potassium iodide solution solution turns brown 3: iron(III) chloride solution added to potassium bromide solution no change Half-equation E° / V Cl₂(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ 2Cl⁻(aq) +1.36 Br₂(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ 2Br⁻(aq) +1.09 Fe³⁺(aq) + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺(aq) +0.77 I₂(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ 2I⁻(aq) +0.54 Mark scheme
Indicative content
- in experiment 1 chlorine is reduced and bromide is oxidised, and E°cell = 1.36 − 1.09 = +0.27 V, so the reaction is feasible
- Cl₂(aq) + 2Br⁻(aq) → 2Cl⁻(aq) + Br₂(aq); the orange-yellow colour is the bromine formed in the solution
- in experiment 2 iron(III) is reduced and iodide is oxidised, and E°cell = 0.77 − 0.54 = +0.23 V, so the reaction is feasible
- 2Fe³⁺(aq) + 2I⁻(aq) → 2Fe²⁺(aq) + I₂(aq), with the iron half-equation doubled and its E° not doubled; the brown colour is iodine
- in experiment 3, for Fe³⁺ to oxidise Br⁻, E°cell = 0.77 − 1.09 = −0.32 V, which is negative, so no reaction is feasible and nothing is seen
- the oxidising agents rank Cl₂ > Br₂ > Fe³⁺ > I₂, and each oxidises only the reduced forms of the couples with less positive E° values
Levels
- Level 3 (5–6 marks) all three experiments are explained with the correct E°cell for each, the two feasible reactions have balanced equations with the colour observed attributed to the product, the third is shown to be not feasible from its negative E°cell, and the order of oxidising power is drawn from the data
- Level 2 (3–4 marks) two experiments are explained with E°cell and an equation, or all three are taken on with one E°cell or one equation wrong or absent
- Level 1 (1–2 marks) one reaction is said to happen, with a colour noted; E° values are quoted and not combined, or the more negative value is taken as the stronger oxidising agent
Calculate E°cell for the reaction of acidified dichromate(VI) ions with iron(II) ions, and write the overall ionic equation. E°(Cr₂O₇²⁻/Cr³⁺) = +1.33 V; E°(Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺) = +0.77 V.
Mark scheme
- M1 dichromate(VI) is reduced, so its half-cell is on the right: E°cell = 1.33 − 0.77
- B1 the dichromate half-equation takes six electrons, so six Fe²⁺ ions are oxidised for each Cr₂O₇²⁻
- B1 Cr₂O₇²⁻(aq) + 14H⁺(aq) + 6Fe²⁺(aq) → 2Cr³⁺(aq) + 7H₂O(l) + 6Fe³⁺(aq); ignore state symbols
- A1 E°cell = +0.56 V
Explain why aluminium shows little reaction with dilute hydrochloric acid at room temperature, although E°(Al³⁺/Al) = −1.66 V predicts that it should react, and give one other reason why a reaction predicted from E° values may not be observed.
Mark scheme
- B1 E°(Al³⁺/Al) is more negative than E°(H⁺/H₂) = 0.00 V, so the reduction of H⁺ by aluminium is feasible, E°cell = +1.66 V
- B1 the aluminium is covered by a thin, unreactive layer of aluminium oxide that keeps the acid off the metal
- B1 so the rate is negligible; E° predicts whether a reaction can happen, not how fast it goes
- B1 the conditions may not be standard, so the actual electrode potentials differ from the E° values used; allow a high activation energy for a different reaction
Explain the effect on the EMF of the cell Cu(s) | Cu²⁺(aq) || Ag⁺(aq) | Ag(s), set up with standard solutions, of (a) adding solid potassium chloride to the silver half-cell, and (b) adding water to the copper half-cell.
Mark scheme
- B1 (a) chloride precipitates silver chloride, so [Ag⁺] falls and Ag⁺(aq) + e⁻ ⇌ Ag(s) shifts to the left
- B1 (a) the silver electrode, on the right, becomes less positive, so the EMF falls
- B1 (b) [Cu²⁺] falls, so Cu²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Cu(s) shifts to the left and the copper electrode becomes less positive
- B1 (b) copper is the left-hand electrode, so E right − E left increases and the EMF rises
Deduce which of magnesium, iron, lead and silver reduce tin(II) ions to tin under standard conditions, using the excerpt of the electrochemical series, and comment on the reliability of the prediction for lead.
Five half-equations from the electrochemical series with their standard electrode potentials. Tin and lead are only 0.01 V apart, so the tin rung is drawn just above its place. Mark scheme
- B1 Sn²⁺ is reduced, so the tin half-cell is on the right and E°cell = −0.14 − E°(metal)
- B1 magnesium, +2.23 V, and iron, +0.30 V, give positive values, so both reduce Sn²⁺
- B1 silver gives −0.94 V and does not reduce Sn²⁺
- B1 lead gives −0.01 V, not feasible, but so close to zero that a small change in concentration could reverse the prediction
Evaluate the conclusion of a student who calculates from E° values that acidified dichromate(VI) does not oxidise chloride ions, and concludes that dichromate(VI) can never be used to make chlorine. E°(Cr₂O₇²⁻/Cr³⁺) = +1.33 V; E°(Cl₂/Cl⁻) = +1.36 V.
Mark scheme
- B1 E°cell = 1.33 − 1.36 = −0.03 V, so the reaction is not feasible under standard conditions and the calculation is correct
- B1 the value is very close to zero, so a small change in conditions can reverse the prediction
- B1 with concentrated hydrochloric acid and heat, higher [H⁺] and [Cl⁻] make the dichromate electrode more positive and the chlorine electrode less positive
- B1 chlorine is then released, so 'never' is not justified; the prediction applies only under standard conditions
Identify the strongest oxidising agent and the strongest reducing agent among the species in the half-equations in the table, and state what is meant by the term oxidising agent.
Half-equation E° / V Zn²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Zn(s) −0.76 Fe²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Fe(s) −0.44 Ag⁺(aq) + e⁻ ⇌ Ag(s) +0.80 Br₂(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ 2Br⁻(aq) +1.09 Mark scheme
- B1 Br₂ is the strongest oxidising agent, as the oxidised form with the most positive E°; reject Br⁻
- B1 Zn is the strongest reducing agent, as the reduced form with the most negative E°; reject Zn²⁺
- B1 an oxidising agent is a species that accepts electrons and is itself reduced
Calculate E°cell for the reaction Sn²⁺(aq) + 2Fe³⁺(aq) → Sn⁴⁺(aq) + 2Fe²⁺(aq), and state whether it is feasible under standard conditions. E°(Sn⁴⁺/Sn²⁺) = +0.15 V; E°(Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺) = +0.77 V.
Mark scheme
- M1 iron(III) is reduced, so the iron half-cell is on the right: E°cell = 0.77 − 0.15
- A1 E°cell = +0.62 V
- B1 E°cell is positive, so the reaction is feasible under standard conditions
Calculate E°cell for 2Ag⁺(aq) + Cu(s) → 2Ag(s) + Cu²⁺(aq). A student gives 2 × 0.80 − 0.34 = +1.26 V. E°(Ag⁺/Ag) = +0.80 V; E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.34 V.
Mark scheme
- M1 silver ions are reduced, so the silver half-cell is on the right: E°cell = 0.80 − 0.34
- M1 the E° of silver is not doubled when its half-equation is doubled, so the student's value is wrong
- A1 E°cell = +0.46 V
Explain, using E° values, why manganate(VII) titrations are acidified with sulfuric acid and not hydrochloric acid. E°(MnO₄⁻/Mn²⁺) = +1.51 V; E°(Cl₂/Cl⁻) = +1.36 V.
Mark scheme
- B1 the manganate(VII) E° is more positive, so MnO₄⁻ oxidises Cl⁻ to Cl₂, with E°cell = +0.15 V
- B1 some manganate(VII) would then react with chloride ions as well as with the substance being analysed
- B1 so the titre would be too large; sulfate ions are not oxidised by manganate(VII)
Explain the effect on the electrode potential of a Cu²⁺/Cu half-cell of increasing the concentration of Cu²⁺ ions above 1.00 mol dm⁻³.
Mark scheme
- B1 the half-cell equilibrium is Cu²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Cu(s)
- B1 increasing [Cu²⁺] shifts the position of equilibrium to the right, so the electrode takes electrons more readily
- B1 the electrode potential becomes more positive than +0.34 V
Explain why gold is found in nature as the metal, whereas sodium is found only in compounds. E°(Au³⁺/Au) = +1.50 V; E°(Na⁺/Na) = −2.71 V; E°(O₂/H₂O) = +1.23 V.
Mark scheme
- B1 the very negative E° of sodium means sodium is a strong reducing agent, readily oxidised to Na⁺ by oxygen and water
- B1 the very positive E° of gold means Au³⁺ is readily reduced and gold atoms are very hard to oxidise
- B1 oxygen's E° of +1.23 V is less positive than gold's +1.50 V, so oxidising gold with oxygen is not feasible and gold stays as the metal
Suggest, using E° values, what is seen when white copper(I) sulfate is added to water. Cu⁺(aq) + e⁻ ⇌ Cu(s), E° = +0.52 V; Cu²⁺(aq) + e⁻ ⇌ Cu⁺(aq), E° = +0.15 V.
Mark scheme
- B1 Cu⁺ is reduced in the first half-equation and oxidised in the reverse of the second, E°cell = 0.52 − 0.15 = +0.37 V, so the reaction is feasible
- B1 2Cu⁺(aq) → Cu(s) + Cu²⁺(aq), a disproportionation
- B1 a brown or pink solid of copper forms in a blue solution of copper(II) ions
Suggest why pale green iron(II) sulfate solution left open to the air slowly turns yellow-brown, and write the equation. O₂(g) + 4H⁺(aq) + 4e⁻ ⇌ 2H₂O(l), E° = +1.23 V; Fe³⁺(aq) + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺(aq), E° = +0.77 V.
Mark scheme
- B1 the oxygen half-equation is more positive, so dissolved oxygen oxidises Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺, E°cell = +0.46 V
- B1 4Fe²⁺(aq) + O₂(g) + 4H⁺(aq) → 4Fe³⁺(aq) + 2H₂O(l)
- B1 Fe³⁺ ions are yellow-brown, and the colour builds up slowly because the reaction is slow at room temperature
Suggest why the EMF of a zinc–copper cell falls as it delivers a current, until no current flows.
Mark scheme
- B1 [Cu²⁺] falls, so Cu²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Cu(s) shifts left and the copper electrode becomes less positive
- B1 [Zn²⁺] rises, so Zn²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Zn(s) shifts right and the zinc electrode becomes less negative
- B1 the difference between the two potentials falls, and is zero when the cell reaction reaches equilibrium
Describe how the anticlockwise rule predicts the reaction between the Zn²⁺/Zn half-cell, E° = −0.76 V, and the Cu²⁺/Cu half-cell, E° = +0.34 V.
Mark scheme
- B1 the half-equations are written as reductions with the more negative, Zn²⁺/Zn, above the more positive, Cu²⁺/Cu
- B1 an anticlockwise loop runs forwards along the lower equation, Cu²⁺ to Cu, and backwards along the upper, Zn to Zn²⁺
- B1 so Cu²⁺ oxidises Zn: Zn(s) + Cu²⁺(aq) → Zn²⁺(aq) + Cu(s)
Compare zinc, iron and copper as reducing agents, using E°(Zn²⁺/Zn) = −0.76 V, E°(Fe²⁺/Fe) = −0.44 V and E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.34 V, and say which of them react with H⁺ ions in a dilute acid.
Mark scheme
- B1 the more negative the E°, the stronger the reducing agent, so zinc is strongest, then iron, then copper
- B1 zinc and iron have E° values below 0.00 V, so each reduces H⁺ to hydrogen, E°cell +0.76 V and +0.44 V
- B1 copper's E° is above 0.00 V, so its reaction with H⁺ would have E°cell = −0.34 V and is not feasible
Calculate the electrode potential at 298 K of a silver half-cell in which [Ag⁺] = 0.010 mol dm⁻³, and the EMF of the cell it makes with a standard copper half-cell. Use the Nernst equation, E = E° + (0.059/z) log₁₀[Ag⁺]. E°(Ag⁺/Ag) = +0.80 V; E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.34 V.
Mark scheme
- M1 z = 1, so E = 0.80 + 0.059 × log₁₀(0.010) = 0.80 + 0.059 × (−2)
- A1 E(Ag⁺/Ag) = +0.68 V
- A1 the silver electrode is still the more positive, so EMF = 0.68 − 0.34 = +0.34 V; allow error carried forward
Calculate ΔG°, in kJ mol⁻¹, for the reaction Cl₂(g) + 2Br⁻(aq) → 2Cl⁻(aq) + Br₂(aq), for which E°cell = +0.27 V. F = 96 500 C mol⁻¹.
Mark scheme
- M1 two electrons are transferred in the equation as written, so n = 2
- M1 ΔG° = −nFE°cell = −2 × 96 500 × 0.27 = −52 110 J mol⁻¹
- A1 ΔG° = −52 kJ mol⁻¹, to the two significant figures of E°cell; allow −52.1; a positive value is rejected
Explain why doubling the equation for a cell reaction doubles its ΔG° but leaves its E°cell unchanged.
Mark scheme
- B1 ΔG° = −nFE°cell, and ΔG° refers to the amounts in the equation as written
- B1 doubling the equation doubles n, the number of moles of electrons transferred, so ΔG° doubles
- B1 E°cell is energy per unit of charge, a property of the two couples that does not depend on how many electrons are written, so it is unchanged
Explain why a reaction with E°cell = +0.80 V goes essentially to completion, whereas one with E°cell = +0.02 V gives an equilibrium mixture.
Mark scheme
- B1 ln K, and the total entropy change, are proportional to E°cell
- B1 a large positive E°cell gives a very large K, so at equilibrium almost no reactant remains
- B1 an E°cell close to zero gives K close to 1, so reactants and products are both present in significant amounts at equilibrium
Practise the electrochemical series and predicting feasibility one question at a time