Chemistry › Practise › Questions › Measurement, uncertainty and significant figures in chemistry
Questions on measurement, uncertainty and significant figures in chemistry
Resolution and the uncertainty of a single reading on a burette, pipette, volumetric flask, balance and thermometer, doubling the uncertainty for a difference of two readings, percentage uncertainty and how it combines through a calculation, reducing percentage uncertainty by measuring more, significant figures, accuracy and precision, random and systematic error, parallax, concordant and anomalous titres in a mean, and the maths a chemistry calculation uses: standard form, rearranging, unit conversion, logarithms, and the gradient and intercept of a straight-line graph.
19 original questions · 65 marks · the measurement, uncertainty and significant figures in chemistry notes · Working in the laboratory · Flashcards for this unit
To print: the written questions (PDF, 74 KB) · the mark schemes (PDF, 76 KB)
How to use this page
- Every question here is written for this library rather than taken from a past paper. Write your answer out before opening a mark scheme: the schemes award marks point by point, and the points are much easier to see when you have something of your own to compare against.
- The player marks nothing for you. It shows one question, waits, then shows the scheme so you can mark yourself, and brings a question back sooner when it went badly.
- Each line of a scheme is one mark: B1 is a point that stands on its own, M1 a method mark, and A1 the answer or an accuracy point. A six-mark question marked by level lists what a full answer covers, then says which level an answer reaches.
- Each question’s code is the one printed in the workbook. Type inklearning.co.uk/q/ and a code to jump to its question.
- A question with board names beside its code is set by those boards only; one with none is on every specification here.
- The PDF links above print the same questions, with the answers in a separate book.
- As a rough guide, allow about 1.4 minutes a mark; each board’s papers run at their own pace.
Question codes are permanent, so the numbers on this page can skip or run out of order; nothing is missing.
Evaluate, in terms of accuracy and precision, the results of two students who titrate portions of the same solution, and suggest the kind of error each set shows. Their accurate titres are given in the table; an experienced analyst using the same solutions finds the true titre to be 23.95 cm³.
Student Titre 1 / cm³ Titre 2 / cm³ Titre 3 / cm³ A 24.10 24.15 24.10 B 23.60 24.40 23.90 Mark scheme
Indicative content
- student A's titres all agree within 0.10 cm³ of one another, so they are concordant and A's results are precise
- A's mean titre is 24.12 cm³, 0.17 cm³ above the true value and outside the ±0.10 cm³ of a titre, so A's results are not accurate
- A's results show a systematic error that moved every titre up by a similar amount, such as a burette rinsed with water that diluted the titrant
- student B's titres spread over 0.80 cm³ and no two agree within 0.10 cm³, so B's results are not precise and none are concordant
- B's mean of 23.97 cm³ lies close to the true value only by chance, because a mean of scattered, non-concordant titres cannot be relied on
- B's results show random error, such as judging the end point inconsistently or reading the meniscus from different heights; B should repeat until titres agree
Levels
- Level 3 (5–6 marks) both students are judged on both accuracy and precision against the true titre, with the concordance and the means used as evidence, the kind of error each set shows is named with a plausible cause, and the answer says what each student should do; precision and accuracy are kept apart throughout
- Level 2 (3–4 marks) both sets are correctly called precise or accurate and one kind of error is named with a cause; the other kind is not identified, or the means are never set against 23.95 cm³
- Level 1 (1–2 marks) one student's results are called accurate because they are close together, with precision and accuracy swapped and no kind of error named
Calculate the titre and its percentage uncertainty when a student's initial burette reading is 1.20 cm³ and her final reading is 23.70 cm³, each reading being uncertain by ±0.05 cm³.
Mark scheme
- M1 titre = 23.70 − 1.20 = 22.50 cm³
- M1 the titre is the difference of two readings, so its uncertainty is 2 × 0.05 = ±0.10 cm³
- M1 percentage uncertainty = 0.10 ÷ 22.50 × 100; error carried forward from an undoubled ±0.05 cm³
- A1 percentage uncertainty = 0.44%; allow 0.444%
Calculate the total percentage uncertainty in a concentration of 0.0915 mol dm⁻³, found by multiplying and dividing the three measurements given in the table, and give the concentration with its absolute uncertainty.
Measurement Value Uncertainty Pipette volume 25.0 cm³ ±0.06 cm³ Mean titre 18.20 cm³ ±0.10 cm³ Volumetric flask 250.0 cm³ ±0.3 cm³ Mark scheme
- M1 the separate percentage uncertainties are 0.24% for the pipette, 0.55% for the titre and 0.12% for the flask
- M1 the quantities are multiplied and divided, so the percentage uncertainties are added, giving 0.91%
- M1 absolute uncertainty = 0.91% of 0.0915 = 0.00083 mol dm⁻³; error carried forward from the total percentage
- A1 0.0915 ± 0.0008 mol dm⁻³, the uncertainty to one significant figure
Compare random errors with systematic errors, giving an example of each from a titration.
Mark scheme
- B1 random errors make readings scatter unpredictably on both sides of the true value, whereas systematic errors shift every reading the same way
- B1 random errors reduce precision, whereas systematic errors reduce accuracy
- B1 the effect of random errors is reduced by repeating and taking a mean, whereas systematic errors are not reduced by repeating
- B1 a random error is judging the end point a drop early or late; a systematic error is a burette rinsed with water, which dilutes the titrant every time
Describe how a burette reading should be taken and recorded, and identify which of these recorded readings is wrong: 0.00 cm³, 12.35 cm³, 24.7 cm³, 36.05 cm³.
Mark scheme
- B1 the eye is level with the meniscus, to avoid a parallax error
- B1 the reading is taken at the bottom of the meniscus
- B1 it is recorded to two decimal places, to the nearest 0.05 cm³, so the last figure is 0 or 5
- B1 24.7 cm³ is wrong, because it has only one decimal place; it should be written 24.70 cm³
Calculate the activation energy, in kJ mol⁻¹, of a reaction whose graph of ln k against 1/T is a straight line through the two points given in the table. The gradient of the line is −Ea/R, and R = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.
Point 1/T / K⁻¹ ln k First 3.200 × 10⁻³ −6.90 Second 3.400 × 10⁻³ −9.30 Mark scheme
- M1 gradient = change in ln k ÷ change in 1/T = −2.40 ÷ (2.00 × 10⁻⁴)
- M1 gradient = −1.20 × 10⁴ K
- M1 Ea = −gradient × R = 1.20 × 10⁴ × 8.31 = 9.97 × 10⁴ J mol⁻¹; error carried forward from the gradient
- A1 Ea = 99.7 kJ mol⁻¹, to three significant figures; allow 99 700 J mol⁻¹ only with the unit J mol⁻¹
Calculate the mean titre from the titration results given in the table, explaining which results are used.
Run Rough 1 2 3 4 Titre / cm³ 22.60 22.15 22.45 22.10 22.20 Mark scheme
- M1 the rough titre is left out, because it was run quickly to find the approximate end point
- M1 22.45 cm³ is left out, because it does not agree with the others within 0.10 cm³ and is anomalous
- M1 mean = (22.15 + 22.10 + 22.20) ÷ 3, using the three concordant titres
- A1 mean titre = 22.15 cm³, to two decimal places
Suggest two causes of a titre that is 0.40 cm³ larger than the three concordant titres in its set, and explain why it is left out of the mean rather than averaged with the others.
Mark scheme
- B1 the end point was overshot, with extra drops added after the indicator had changed colour
- B1 an air bubble in the burette tip escaped during the titration and was counted as titre; allow a misread burette reading
- B1 the titre lies far outside the agreement of the concordant titres, so it comes from a fault in that run, not from the true end point
- B1 including it would pull the mean away from the value the concordant titres agree on, making the result less accurate
State the uncertainty of a single reading on each of: a 50 cm³ burette marked every 0.10 cm³, a balance whose display reads to 0.01 g, and a thermometer marked every 1 °C.
Mark scheme
- B1 the burette reading is uncertain by ±0.05 cm³, half of the 0.10 cm³ division, because the scale is read by eye
- B1 the balance reading is uncertain by ±0.01 g, one in the last digit of the display; allow ±0.005 g only where the question states it
- B1 the thermometer reading is uncertain by ±0.5 °C, half of the 1 °C division
Calculate the amount, in mol, of sodium hydroxide in 22.40 cm³ of a 0.125 mol dm⁻³ solution, and give the answer in standard form.
Mark scheme
- M1 volume = 22.40 ÷ 1000 = 0.02240 dm³, converting cm³ to dm³
- M1 amount = concentration × volume = 0.125 × 0.02240
- A1 2.80 × 10⁻³ mol, in standard form to three significant figures; reject 2.8 × 10⁰ from an unconverted volume
Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the mass of solid transferred when a weighing bottle and solid weigh 14.73 g and the bottle weighs 12.28 g after the solid has been tipped out. The balance display reads to 0.01 g.
Mark scheme
- M1 mass transferred = 14.73 − 12.28 = 2.45 g
- M1 the mass comes from two readings, each ±0.01 g, so its uncertainty is ±0.02 g
- A1 percentage uncertainty = 0.02 ÷ 2.45 × 100 = 0.82%; allow 0.41% only from a stated ±0.005 g a reading
Calculate the percentage uncertainty in a temperature rise when the starting temperature is 21.0 °C and the highest temperature is 27.5 °C, both read on a thermometer with an uncertainty of ±0.5 °C per reading.
Mark scheme
- M1 temperature rise = 27.5 − 21.0 = 6.5 °C
- M1 the rise comes from two readings, so its uncertainty is ±1.0 °C
- A1 percentage uncertainty = 1.0 ÷ 6.5 × 100 = 15%
Explain why repeating a titration several times does not remove a systematic error, using the example of a burette rinsed with water instead of the acid it holds.
Mark scheme
- B1 a systematic error shifts every reading in the same direction by a similar amount
- B1 water left in the burette dilutes the acid every time, so every titre is too large
- B1 repeats all carry the same error, so they agree with each other and the mean is still too large; the error is removed only by fixing its cause
Explain why a titration designed to give a titre of about 25 cm³ gives a more reliable result than one giving a titre of about 10 cm³.
Mark scheme
- B1 the absolute uncertainty of the titre is ±0.10 cm³ whatever its size, because it comes from the burette
- B1 on 10 cm³ that is a percentage uncertainty of 1.0%, but on 25 cm³ it is 0.4%
- B1 the larger titre therefore has the smaller percentage uncertainty, so the calculated result is known more precisely
Explain how many significant figures a concentration should be given to when a calculator shows 0.0827519 mol dm⁻³ from a mass of 1.06 g, a titre of 24.15 cm³ and a 25.0 cm³ pipette, and give the answer.
Mark scheme
- B1 a result cannot be more precise than the least precise data used to calculate it
- B1 the mass and the pipette volume have three significant figures, fewer than the four of the titre
- B1 the answer is 0.0828 mol dm⁻³; reject 0.08275 and reject 0.083
Suggest two changes that would reduce the percentage uncertainty in the mass of a 0.12 g piece of magnesium ribbon weighed by difference on a balance whose display reads to 0.01 g, and show how large that uncertainty is at present.
Mark scheme
- B1 the mass is uncertain by ±0.02 g from two readings, which is 0.02 ÷ 0.12 × 100 = 17% of the mass
- B1 use a larger mass of magnesium, scaling up the acid and the gas collection to match, so the same ±0.02 g is a smaller fraction of the mass
- B1 use a balance with a finer resolution, such as one reading to 0.001 g, so a mass by difference is uncertain by ±0.002 g; ignore 'repeat and take a mean'
Show that, in a titration using a 25.0 cm³ pipette with an uncertainty of ±0.06 cm³ and a burette read to ±0.05 cm³, a titre of 20.00 cm³ carries a larger percentage uncertainty than the pipette volume does.
Mark scheme
- M1 pipette: (0.06 ÷ 25.0) × 100 = 0.24%
- M1 the titre is the difference between two burette readings, so its uncertainty is 2 × 0.05 = ±0.10 cm³
- A1 titre: (0.10 ÷ 20.00) × 100 = 0.50%, which is larger than 0.24%; the burette contributes about twice the uncertainty of the pipette
Suggest what effect a thermometer that reads 1.5 °C too high at every temperature has on a measured temperature rise, and why.
Mark scheme
- B1 the temperature rise is not affected by the faulty thermometer
- B1 the rise is the difference of two readings, and the same 1.5 °C offset in each reading cancels when one is subtracted from the other
Give two sources of random error in a titration.
Mark scheme
- B1 judging the exact drop at which the indicator changes colour
- B1 reading the meniscus slightly differently from one reading to the next
Practise measurement, uncertainty and significant figures in chemistry one question at a time